Why Are Pants Called Pairs. calling them a pair of pantaloons, or pants, as they were eventually known, made sense when there were two components. The phrasing was retained even after pants. The vast majority of a pair of pants covers the legs, which come. given that the french word for scissors is plural, they're familiar with the concept, but they went the opposite way on pants. the reason pants come in pairs but shirts do not probably has to do with where our belts are: And single pantaloon is one pant leg, so a pair of pantaloons became a pair of pants. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s. but clearly this is merely an extension of the expression, “pair of pants.” further confusing matters is “a dozen pairs. it's because pants is short for pantaloons. it’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: according to the accepted answer here, why is the word pants plural?, it's because trousers were originally made in two parts and fastened together when. the reason why we refer to “a pair of underwear” followed the same logic as the pants or trousers, based on the way the garments evolved.
from www.chegg.com
but clearly this is merely an extension of the expression, “pair of pants.” further confusing matters is “a dozen pairs. given that the french word for scissors is plural, they're familiar with the concept, but they went the opposite way on pants. according to the accepted answer here, why is the word pants plural?, it's because trousers were originally made in two parts and fastened together when. And single pantaloon is one pant leg, so a pair of pantaloons became a pair of pants. the reason why we refer to “a pair of underwear” followed the same logic as the pants or trousers, based on the way the garments evolved. The vast majority of a pair of pants covers the legs, which come. calling them a pair of pantaloons, or pants, as they were eventually known, made sense when there were two components. the reason pants come in pairs but shirts do not probably has to do with where our belts are: it’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: it's because pants is short for pantaloons.
Solved A textile company produces shirts and pants. Each
Why Are Pants Called Pairs Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s. the reason why we refer to “a pair of underwear” followed the same logic as the pants or trousers, based on the way the garments evolved. but clearly this is merely an extension of the expression, “pair of pants.” further confusing matters is “a dozen pairs. given that the french word for scissors is plural, they're familiar with the concept, but they went the opposite way on pants. calling them a pair of pantaloons, or pants, as they were eventually known, made sense when there were two components. The vast majority of a pair of pants covers the legs, which come. And single pantaloon is one pant leg, so a pair of pantaloons became a pair of pants. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s. it’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: according to the accepted answer here, why is the word pants plural?, it's because trousers were originally made in two parts and fastened together when. The phrasing was retained even after pants. it's because pants is short for pantaloons. the reason pants come in pairs but shirts do not probably has to do with where our belts are:
